Neo4j

akira · 12-13-2022

Greetings, I am trying to obtain all paths and relationships of a specific node. I currently run the following: MATCH (n) WHERE id(n) = 2607 AND 1665263599000 <= apoc.date.fromISO8601(toString(n.ns0__atTime[0])) <= 1665273599000 CALL apoc.path.subgr...

akira · 12-15-2022

Thank you so much, glilienfield When you said labels and traversing only the special labels, I saw in apoc.path.subgraphAll that you can have a whitelist and to store all the pooled data into that whitelist. It reduced the overall run time by nearly ...

akira · 12-14-2022

Greetings, glilienfield What do you mean when you say that I can configure labels to include and exclude? And how do I add a new label to nodes that I want within my time frame and then include that match into my path finder? Thank you very much for ...

akira · 12-14-2022

Hello again glilienfield The return of the sizes is ╒═════════════╤═════════════════════╕ │"size(nodes)"│"size(relationships)"│ ╞═════════════╪═════════════════════╡ │75895 │231033 │ └─────────────┴─────────────────────┘ This i...

akira · 12-13-2022

Greetings, glilienfield Indeed, the AND does result in no rows however, the OR filter results in much more than expected rows. When I run an EXPLAIN with just the OR filter with return count(n), I get around 400 nodes However, when I run EXPLAIN with...

akira · 12-13-2022

The strange thing is that, if the filter is the following, using AND WHERE id(n) = 2607 AND 1665263599000 <= apoc.date.fromISO8601(toString(n.ns0__atTime[0])) <= 1665273599000 or using OR WHERE id(n) = 2607 OR 1665263599000 <= apoc.date.from...

Neo4j

User Statistics

User Activity

apoc.path.subgraphAll Filter Issue

Re: apoc.path.subgraphAll Filter Issue

Re: apoc.path.subgraphAll Filter Issue

Re: apoc.path.subgraphAll Filter Issue

Re: apoc.path.subgraphAll Filter Issue

Re: apoc.path.subgraphAll Filter Issue