cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Head's Up! These forums are read-only. All users and content have migrated. Please join us at community.neo4j.com.

Forum Posts

Beta Opportunity for Neo4j Workspace

Introducing Neo4j Workspace We’re inviting you to check out Neo4j Workspace. Workspace combines our most powerful graph tools (Data Importer, Bloom, and Browser) all in one place to help you get up and running with graph databases faster. For experie...

Screen Shot 2022-10-14 at 12.48.07 PM.png
TrevorS by Community Team
  • 966 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 kudos

About the Neo4j Graph Platform Category

The Neo4j Graph Platform includes the core database and all the technologies surrounding the database, making it useful and accessible for a lot of different users. When asking a question, please select a descriptive label that best matches your quer...

Neo4j-graph-database-to-graph-platform.png
yolande by Community Team
  • 1195 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 1 kudos

AWS EC2 4.x AMI?

I searched and I didn't find an answer. So apologies if I'm posting this in the wrong place or being redundant. I noticed that neo4j took down the Community Edition 4.x AMI on AWS EC2. Is this a temporary thing or have they abandoned EC2?

david8 by Node Link
  • 486 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! Syntax for returning distinct nodes

So here's my dilemma... I want to be able to find distinct pairs of node with some value (a: nodeA {number: 1}), that are found in node (b) by distinct pairs I mean: 1,2 3,4 and not: 1,2 2,1 I'm just looking for the proper syntax so I can implement i...

Shukaku by Node Link
  • 849 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 2 kudos

Querying relationships slow performance

Hi there, I've got a database with 18k nodes and 200m relationships. I've used one of the node's properties ("User_ID") as the ID, and I've created a unique constraint on this property. When I run a query to get 2 random nodes by their User IDs, the ...

Not possible to upgrade a store with version 'v0.A.7' to current store version `SF4.0.0` (Neo4j 4.0.0) error when upgrading from neo4j 3.5.14 to 4.0.0

Our current neo4j version is 3.1.6. We want to upgrade to neo4j version 4.0. We first upgraded from 3.1.6 to 3.5.14 which worked. But migrating from 3.5.14 to 4.0.0 is throwing the following error: Caused by: org.neo4j.kernel.impl.storemigration.Stor...

How to know if timeout occurred in cypher query?

I'm using apoc.cypher.runTimeboxed https://neo4j.com/labs/apoc/4.1/cypher-execution/cypher-timeboxed/ I'm using the HTTP API of neo4j. I'm making HTTP post requests like below. Here I do NOT see any difference if the results are really empty or if t...

canbax by Node Link
  • 331 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! Path bind / matching question

Hey everyone - I am hoping someone can help me convert my syntax for a specific query... The following query yields the result I desire (seen in the screen shot below): MATCH (e:Employee)-[r:IS_ALIGNED_TO] ->(t:Territory)-[l:IS_CHILD_OF*] ->...

2X_e_e5130b3f7c1e4538737fc6736a31ac7b65320223.png 2X_0_08035c0720cea3c3c6007803d556b82321ade396.png
tmvt by Node Link
  • 560 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! Installation and usage of apoc shows unusual behaviour

I am having issues with starting my database after trying to update apoc. I replaced apoc-*.jar in the plugins folder: In short it says: Plugin jar file: /var/lib/neo4j/plugins/apoc-4.1.0.0-all.jar corrupted. see more detailed debug info below see ...

sinan by Node Clone
  • 1196 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 3 kudos

Resolved! Count related nodes that have certain property

Hi Neo4j'ers, Given Companies which have related PSCs (Persons of Significant Control). I'm trying to get an ordered list of those companies based on how many of their PSCs have a certain shareholding value. The following query returns a random set o...

mikeM by Node Link
  • 792 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 kudos